<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/style.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>OCS 2007 R2, Trixbox, and Unified Messaging, Part 1 - comments</title>
		<description></description>
		<link>http://www.delmartian.com/</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 07:52:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Part 2 ?</title>
			<link>http://www.delmartian.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=OCS-2007-R2-Trixbox-and-Unified-Messaging-Part-1.html&amp;Itemid=&amp;comment_id=389#josc389</link>
			<description>good stuff. did you ever continue and do further testing?</description>
			<author>Greg</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:53:41 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>no comment title</title>
			<link>http://www.delmartian.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&amp;show=OCS-2007-R2-Trixbox-and-Unified-Messaging-Part-1.html&amp;Itemid=&amp;comment_id=390#josc390</link>
			<description>@Greg: This project was temporarily put on the back burner.  In the not TOO distant future, I expect to continue with Part 2, which will document how to get OCS/Exchange/UM working with this infrastructure.

One thing I did discover after writing this blog post: for the specific usage of providing a POTS gateway for OCS/Exchange/UM, I/you/we may not need to use Asterisk/Trixbox at all!  In other words, the AFT400 has OCS-specific functionality built in (if you know the secret handshake to activate it) that seems to be \&quot;enough\&quot; to act as a POTS gateway without using Asterisk/Trixbox.  As I figure all of that stuff out I will post about it.</description>
			<author>Tom Karpowitz</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:05:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
